With the election over and
Bush victorious, the Republican leadership sacks the
Congressman who has been veteran’s staunchest supporter.
By Stewart Nusbaumer
In the recent
presidential campaign, George Bush attacked John
Kerry for not supporting our troops in Iraq. Now
that the election is over, George Bush has allowed
the sacking of Congress’s staunchest supporter of
military veterans, Representative Chris Smith from
New Jersey.
And Bush called Kerry a flip-flopper?
“What kind of message are we sending to those troops
who are now coming back with arms and legs missing?”
asks disabled Vietnam veteran Charles Carroll in the
Trenton Times. “That’s outrageous, isn’t it?
That’s a slap in the face, isn’t it?”
“You go to war with the
military you have,” Secretary of Defense Donald
Rumsfeld told America last month, making it clear
what is most important to the Bush Administration is
the war, not the troops fighting the war. And now
that the search for Weapons of Mass Destruction has
ended, it is clear to all--except the Fox faithful
deep in their armchair foxholes--that the war in
Iraq was unnecessary. |
 |
When a nation’s leaders are
indifferent to the safety of their troops, sending them into
battle without proper equipment and in insufficient numbers,
and, incredibly, sending them to a war that is unnecessary,
something has gone drastically wrong in America. What has
gone drastically wrong is we have a president who clearly
does not respect and value the lives of America’s soldiers,
except during the presidential campaign.
So I was not surprised yesterday when House Republicans,
with the full support of the White House, demoted and
humiliated the leading advocate for veterans in Congress. As
our soldiers die and lose limbs in Iraq, as more disabled
veterans seek assistance in Veterans Administration’s
facilities, the Republican Party sacked Chris Smith, the
chairman of the House Veterans’ Affairs committee. In
degrading the best friend military veterans had in
Washington, the Republicans degraded all military veterans.
“During his four-year tenure,” Ari Berman writes in the
Nation, “Chris Smith authored twenty-two bills
benefiting veterans: increasing veteran education funding
through the GI bill by 46 percent, allocating $1 billion for
homeless vets and $1.4 billion for expanded healthcare
programs, and providing an extra $100 million in benefits
for surviving spouses.”
“The leadership’s problem with Smith,” said conservative
Robert Novak in the Chicago Sun-Times, “has been his
insatiable desire to make life better for veterans during
his 24 years on the Veterans Affairs Committee.”
Smith had angered tax-slashing-during-wartime Republicans
because he did not believe stingy VA budgets were fair to
those who have paid the cost to defend this nation, or fight
in its follies, unlike the Republican Party leadership who
are eager to slash the veterans’ budget. Because
Representative Smith was defeated yesterday in the political
trenches of Washington, former soldiers, and those current
soldiers fighting now in Iraq and Afghanistan, will soon be
paying the cost in reduced health care and benefits here in
America.
According to Ari Berman, a top Republican aide justified his
party’s sacking of Smith because they need someone who will
tell veterans groups, “Enough is enough.”
In hearing that he lost his chairmanship of the Veterans
Committee, Chris Smith told the Trenton Times, “It's
almost as if no good deed goes unpunished.”
Stewart Nusbaumer is editor of Intervention Magazine. He
served with the U.S. Marine Corps in Vietnam on the DMZ. You
can email Stewart at
Stewart@interventionmag.com
Posted Thursday, January 13, 2005
|